I lifted this from my web site. I wrote most of it over a decade ago, and have subsequently edited it a few times, although still probably not completely pleased with it lol.
One can classify Luciferianism into different currents depending on
the exact occultic interests of the individual and what types of magic
an individual likes to practise. One current that I have written about
the most in the past is Gnostic Luciferianism, somewhat arbitrarily,
some of which is reproduced below.
Gnostic Luciferianism is primarily a type of Luciferianism, but one
which includes a heavy Classical Gnostic component. The term Gnosis has
in recent times become almost a disposal, throwaway term in occultism,
used to describe any kind of occult related knowledge. It has a definite
historical usage in Hellenic and Judeo-Christian spiritual lineages.
Gnostic Luciferianism is generally a fusion of Classic (Alexandrian?)
Gnostic religious cosmology, symbolism and philosophy combined with
contemporary Luciferianism, whereby Gnostic Luciferianism are Gnostic in
the panentheistic/monist sense or in an agnostic, symbolic sense.
Gnostic Luciferians in this sense are still Gnostics. Gnostic Luciferianism however is also used to describe the
incorporation of 19th and 20th Century positive gnostic ceremonial
hermetic magic and spiritual philosophical practices and ideas,
including Theosophy, Freemasonry, Hermetic Kabbalah, Golden Dawn,
Thelema and/or Hoodoo or Voudon, into Luciferianism. These practices may
well be balanced with other currents and interests such as Eastern
internal alchemical practices such as Qi Gong, Taoist Yoga, Kundalini
Yoga and Tantra, Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), Transactional
Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Lucid Dreaming, Astral Projection, creative
visualisation, Chaos Magic, Reiki, and/or Psychic Vampirism, but clearly
it depends on the individual as Luciferianism is extremely diverse.
Most of this latter type Gnostic Luciferians tend to be more agnostic
and atheistic. However, some may simply call this Luciferianism rather
Gnostic Luciferianism.
The more Classic type Gnostic Luciferians may not necessary embrace
ceremonial magic at all, e.g. Bestian Gnosticism, which is more Satanic,
Luciferian, Kemetic and Jungian in concept, but combined with Classic
Gnostic concepts and cosmology. At the extreme end of Gnostic
Luciferianism is the 218 current and Anti-Cosmic Gnosticism, which can
be Luciferian or perhaps Satanist, with less concept of balance with
light and dark, which I will not examine in this article. The purpose of
this article is to examine Gnostic Luciferianism specifically rather
than Luciferianism as a whole, although some generic Luciferian concepts
are mentioned. Whilst Satanism, especially LaVey Satanism, draw on anti-Christian
principles and imagery, and glorify the self in perhaps a somewhat
excessive and materialistic manner, Gnostic Luciferianism tend more
towards an open approach to religion in general, drawing from a variety
of different religious sources, and taking from each what it sees as
useful, from the perspective of the self, to seek both light and dark
principles. This is perhaps less so for Modern Luciferianism which is
less focussed on 'religious mish mash' and tends to stick to hermetic
texts and the occult, drawing less influence from different world
religions and indeed Gnosticism.
Some Modern Lucifierianism dislike the
tendency for Gnostic Luciferianism in some cases to adopt a
heterogeneous Left Hand Path meets Right Hand Path approach. Clearly
this depends on the individual and there is considerable freedom within
Gnostic Luciferianism to choose one's own path and to indeed become
extremely confused! Spiritual Satanism in some sense could be likened to Gnostic
Luciferianism, however the difference is really that whilst Spiritual
Satanism may draw on other religions, mainly Taoism and Buddhism, there
is still a primary belief in a 'dark God', like with Traditional
Satanism, with the 'dark Lord' or dark gods having greater significance
than for a Luciferian who tends to be more pragmatic or scientific about
it (a means to an end). Luciferianism, on the other hand, is more about
developing the self, and gaining wisdom, in the absence or not of any
literal spiritual beliefs about a deity or deities. A Luciferian may not
feel so tied to the said deity than a Satanist. Gnostic Luciferianism is more syncretic and hetereogeneous than
'classic' Gnosticism.
It is in general either the worship of a deity
Lucifer (not usual); or the recognition of Lucifer as an archetype, ally
or guide, often represented by various historical prophets, deities,
Gnostic Aeons and/or philosophical positions. In the latter scenario,
one can consider the allying with, embodying of, learning from or use of
one particular 'Lucifer' or several 'Lucifers'. Most Luciferians and
Gnostic Luciferians do not worship the deity Lucifer, although a
minority indeed do. More commonly it is something which one invokes from
oneself, a reflection of the self. The concept in Gnostic Luciferianism
is to plant the seed of thought into one's mind and let the mind take
it where it wishes, to one's own personal expression of the Self and
one's Will, a little like Gnostic texts and some passages from the
canonical gospels do (but perhaps different in outcome to the latter
depending on interpretation).
Gnostic Luciferianism draws on the cosmology of Gnosticism, in a
literal sense as defining the universe, or a metaphoric sense as
defining the Self. Gnostic Luciferianism then may use a literal Gnostic
framework for the incorporation of other religious beliefs, or it may
indeed use a metaphoric understanding to the Gnostic cosmology as a
principle in which to reinterpret/understand other chosen religions,
occult practices or belief systems. The one true, benevolent, mysterious God, Monad, or rather his
Pleroma, may indeed be venerated or recognised (by some GLs). As with
Gnosticism, theistic Gnostic Luciferianism holds that (in some sense)
the creator God, called Demiurge, is synonymous with the Hebrew God of
the Old Testament. Demiurge is for the theists regarded as being evil
and imperfect and created a flawed world and physical universe full of
death, disease, suffering and pain (using the Neo-Platonic and Buddhist
concept of physical or earthly suffering). Demiurge trapped the human
soul into human form and condemned it to a cycle of endless 'suffering',
through birth and death (reincarnation). The Aeons of Gnostic Luciferianism are messengers of light emanating
from Monad/Pleroma. They may include messiahs, and deities drawn from
various religions, that emanate from the one true God, Monad - from
Gnostic scriptures or interpreted in a Gnostic sense. The Lucifers may
also include philosophers and prophets. They depend very much on the
type of Gnostic Luciferianism one is talking about. These messengers are
figures of light and self-actualisation, helping followers to achieve
Gnosis, but offering a variety of different types of secret knowledge,
enlightenment and aspects of Gnosis.
Followers of Gnostic Luciferianism
can choose which Aeon or Lucifer they wish to worship, venerate,
recognise or acknowledge, according to their true path or 'Will'.
Gnostic Luciferian Aeons often include the Gnostic Jesus Christ (aka
Luciferi Christos), Buddha, The Serpent and the deity Prometheus. Those that believe in the Gnostic cosmology and Gnostic philosophy,
but apply it to their lives in the context of Luciferian philosophy and
occultism, do not generally regard Monad as 'Lucifer' in general terms.
Lucifer is still the archetype of the self, in its light and dark, and
indeed higher aspects, as embodied and manifested in occult ritual.
Monad is just regarded as Monad. The definition of God or Monad within
Gnostic Luciferianism is not the same as in the normal Judao-Christian
sense or Right-Handed sense, perhaps being seen as a benevolent force or
ally that helps one to experience Gnosis, knowledge, and self-conscious
spiritual awakening from the experience/viewpoint of the Self. This is
in some sense a cross between the Right-Hand goal of uniting with God,
or learning from and emulating the essence and spirit of God, but from a
Self stance, and the Left-Hand Path of self-deification and ultimate
evolution of the Self.
In classic Gnosticism, by achieving Gnosis (choosing one aspect or
multiple aspects of Gnosis from the various messengers) a person is able
to break out of the cycle of life and death and rebirth and to ascent
to join the Pleroma (the fullness or totality of divine powers) for
eternity. See the section on for more information. In Gnostic Luciferianism, the exact details and
possibly the concept of what Gnosis actually is is probably slightly
different from that of Classic Gnosticism, as it contains a somewhat
Luciferic component in addition to the Classic Gnostic cosmology and
Aeons. Gnostic Luciferianism is like most other Gnosticism in that it
acknowledges, venerates and/or worships the true, mysterious God, Monad,
or rather his Pleroma, but rejects the evil creator God (the Hebrew
Jehovah). Whilst the process of seeking illuminism and 'spiritual' self-awareness through Gnosis could be considered a ,
the actual Gnostic goal within Gnosticism and indeed Gnostic
Luciferianism of working towards something after one's death (i.e.
breaking out of the 'prison' of cyclic existence and reintegration with
God/Monad/the Pleroma) is a Right-Hand Path - although I do not believe
many Luciferians really have this as a goal. There are probably
parallels with the Temple of Set's goal of the uniting with the Black
Flame.
The concept of Gnosis within Gnostic Luciferianism is not restricted
to the classical Gnostic definition and that attained through
demonology, Thelema, Chaos Magic, LaVey Satanism and other 'dark' magic.
Indeed the term is used in Chaos Magic as a fundamental part of
practice. It may, depending on the individual's Will, other occult
traditions, philosophies and sciences, such as hermetic quabalah,
sabbat, tarot, other divination, astrology, lucid dreaming, astral
projection, psychology, astronomy, astrophysics, particle physics,
Eastern philosophies (Taoism, Ayurveda, Tantra, Yoga etc.) and indeed
many other areas. It does not tend to involve 'new age' areas such as
spiritual healing as the focus is on self-healing and the self rather
than healing or helping others. This is discussed on the page. Gnostic Luciferianism is a diverse arena and its form depends on
the uptake by the individual. Intellectual development and illuminism is
thought to enable great spiritual understanding and thought and vice
versa. Some might argue that the concept of Gnosis in Gnostic Luciferianism
is not consistent with the concept of (Theistic) Satanic Intelligence.
Clearly Luciferian Gnosis is not quite the same as classic Gnosticism's
idea of Gnosis, as it is broader in its remit and contains lighter and
darker elements. However, this is some commonality with the concept of
the Self. The idea of Luciferian Gnosis as mentioned above is considered
a higher form of Self-wisdom and is not just fixated on sensory
gratification and 'knee jerk' hostility and rebellion for the sake of
it.
That is not to say that there are no elements of Satanism within it. 'Modern' Gnostic Luciferians may use the framework and cosmology of
Gnosticism, and incorporate their own spiritual and occult beliefs and
practices into these. In this manner, they are free to choose the Aeons
they most venerate or acknowledge, if at all, but also choose exactly
how they view Monad (if at all). In addition, they are free to go
between the different Aeons or belief systems, embracing both light and
dark elements, to achieve 'balance.' It is likely that in most Gnostic Luciferianism, that the Gnostic
Cosmology is a metaphor or analogues for the Neo-Platonic ideas about
the formation one's Self, rather than being a literal cosmology. The
majority of Luciferians in general that I have come across are either
Agnostics or Atheists, and indeed, many Gnostic Luciferians do not
appear to be theistic at all, but more agnostic. For them, the Gnostic
cosmology could be true, but it cannot be proven, so it is regarded as
more rational to merely keep an open mind in the agnostic sense, but
whilst using the symbolism as it relates closely to the human
experience. Life on earth is a pursuit for knowledge of the self, wisdom
and enlightenment, for Gnosis, to achieve Self-Mastery whilst alive.
Regarding reincarnation, rebirth or a concept of the afterlife, who
knows? It cannot be proven.
Atheistic and indeed many agnostic Luciferians appear to be simply
more balanced and philosophical than their atheistic LaVey Satanist
counterparts, who enjoy life but also exercise restraint and balance,
rather than pursue unbalanced hedonism or a Sinister path alone. Gnostic Luciferians may well draw upon some of the philosophical
aspects of Gnostic Luciferianism and its dark magic rituals, but in
general tend to bring their old religious/philosophical ideas with them
and simply evolve them a little rather than replace them, but it depends
on their background and how long they have been practising the LHP.
Those coming from a Christian background may well tend to keep Gnostic
Christianity within their Luciferian model for a number of years and
slowly over time lose interest in it and eliminate more of the
Judeo-Christian influences from their practice. For example, whilst practising an invocation of Lucifer ritual, it
may not literally be a deity who is believed to be invoked, but rather
those feelings and illuminated and magical qualities in oneself that one
believes one is invoking. For many, the broader concept of Luciferian
Gnosis is that of intellectual illuminism and wisdom (through a variety
of studies and practices, one of which is occult practice), a process to
enjoy whilst one is alive to enrich one's life, a Left-Hand Path,
rather than a means to an end to achieve the Gnostic Right-Hand Path
goal of reintegration with the Pleroma. This is in keeping with Gnostic
Luciferianism's claim to be a Left-Hand Path.
Whilst drawing on
Gnosticism and Gnostic Christianity, Gnostic Luciferianism is still very
much concerned with the Self, as is a ,
and distinct from modern, mainstream Christianity which is very much a
Right-Hand Path. Whether the Gnostic goal is a 'side effect' of
Luciferian Gnosis or really a goal for some adherents is probably
something that depends on the individual. For some, admitting any
Right-Hand Path aspects may be 'unfashionable'! There are very few Gnostic Luciferian texts in circulation. Many
Gnostic Luciferians rely on the Gnostic cosmology as defined by the Nag
Hammadi Library, and in particular, 'On the Origin of the World' and
also 'The Gospel of Judas'. These considered broadly considered Gnostic
Luciferian and also broadly associated with neo-Manichaeism. There is
some considerable overlap between Manichaeism and Gnostic Luciferianism. There are however differences between Manichaeism and 'Theistic'
Gnostic Luciferianism. Manichaeism does not use recognise Prometheus as a
deity/Aeon, nor does it involve the practice of magical rites and
rituals or tarot.
It is likely that Hermeticism as a whole, and in
particular the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn of the 19th Century,
and Thelema of the early 20th Century, helped to form the magic and
occult element of Gnostic Luciferianism. This is seen as another way of
achieving Gnosis. It is not certain exactly when Gnostic Luciferianism was first
founded. The term 'Gnostic Luciferian' can sometimes be found mentioned
in 19th Century works such as Eliphas Levi's Dogme et Rituel de la Haute
Magie, first published in 1855. Jeremy Crow, claims to have popularised
the term in 2002, when he promoted it within the Gnostic community,
although elements of the philosophy have been present for arguably
several decades. It is thus uncertain whether Gnostic Luciferianism is
indeed very modern or whether it existed much earlier. It is probably
nothing particularly new but a recycling of Traditional Luciferianism
and combining it with other magical traditions like Thelema and Chaos
Magic, Gnostic Christianity, Satanism and the ideas of Social Darwinist
and Nihilist philosophers. Many of the Luciferian concepts have been
circulating within Chaos Magic practice since the late 1970s. So whether
it should be called Gnostic Luciferianism or Neo/Modern Gnostic
Luciferianism - or simply an extension of Chaos Magick - is a matter of
debate - but I have not come across many Gnostic Luciferians so whether
the term should be used at all is a matter of debate, above and beyond
'Luciferianism'. It is possible that the Gnostic Ophites are the earliest inspiration
for what we see today as Gnostic Luciferianism.
The Ophites or Ophians
(Greek for snake) is the term used to refer to any of numerous Gnostic
sects in Syria and Egypt around 100 AD, who gave great importance to the
serpent of the biblical tale of Adam and Eve, connecting the Tree of
Knowledge (of Good and Evil) to gnosis. In contrast to Christian
interpretations of the Serpent as Satan, Ophites viewed the serpent as
the hero of Genesis, and in line with classic Eastern/Persian
Gnosticism, regarding the Hebrew God of the Old Testament as the the
'evil Demiurge'. The following Sects are regarded as being/having been Ophite Gnostic Sects: - Naasseners (from Hebrew na'asch = snake)
- The Sethians
- The Mandaeans are considered an Ophite religion that has survived (up to and including the present day).
- The Perates (from the Greek language peras, "to penetrate")
- The Borborites
According to Diane Vera, a Theistic Satanist, Gnostic Luciferianism
is based on ancient Ophite Gnosticism, usually combined with subsequent
Western occult traditions.
Diane claims that:
Diane Vera, regards Gnostic Luciferianism in general as a form of
Secondary Theistic Satanism. She defines Secondary Theistic Satanism as a
religion or spirituality in which Satan is part of the pantheon and is
worshipped, revered, or at least propitiated in some way, at least to
some extent, but is not the primary object of worship, veneration,
reverence or emulation. She claims that a subset of Neo-Gnostic
Luciferians revere Satan as well as Lucifer, but regard Satan as a
distinct entity. Gnostic Luciferians however claim not to worship an
entity called Lucifer per se, but worship or revere Aeons or 'Lucifers'.
Is Satan then one of these 'Lucifers' or is he just an archetype?
Others also believe Gnostic Luciferianism to be closely linked to Theistic Satanism or a subset of Theistic Satanism., from what I have understood from his articles, associates Jesus, Buddha and Prometheus with Lucifer. Luciferian Research Society, created by Jeremy Crow, is a Ning-hosted
social media community for LHP practitioners, and seems to occupy a
middle ground between its Luciferian focus (and name) and being a
generic LHP community. There are other Luciferian groups and forums on
the internet but this is probably the biggest specialist community,
outside of religiousforums.com etc. Gnostic Luciferianism introduces a wider variety of Aeons, prophets,
teachers or Lucifers than can be found in classic Gnosticism. In this
sense, Gnostic Luciferianism is more syncretic than Gnosticism. However,
the criticism of Gnosticism that I have that focussing too widely on a
variety of interlinked teachings does not really allow one to full
embrace the spirit of those teachings (at all, in enough depth or for
long enough) applies even more so here.
I find that Gnostic Luciferianism as a whole often seems to attract
people who consider themselves to be very intelligent and philosophical,
almost to the point of narcissism and pretentiousness. Making out that
one is intelligent and sharp, and refraining from cussing, and appearing
so, is for some a matter of status and image - much as for some
Satanists, appearing to be the most 'powerful' is attributed with the
greatest status amongst peers.
Some may consider a casual interest in
chaos mathematics, quantum mechanics and astronomy, and gaining a dark
and morbid ego trip/buzz from it, makes one enlightened. Well, it takes a
little more than this and a limited amount of contrarian
historical/religious knowledge to feign any reasonable understanding of
the modern man, modern society, and indeed the universe. There are inherent contradictions between the Gnostic world view
(suffering, reincarnation, uniting with Godhead etc.), ascetic
Gnosticism and the Satanic/LHP ideal of hedonism, but then again,
hedonism could be said to represent art and other pursuits rather than
just boozing, drug abuse and swingers parties etc. Hedonists do not tend
to be the most balanced individuals one comes across in normal
scenarios. If hedonism can be tightly controlled, is it going to
contribute to 'gnosis' in the traditional Gnostic sense? Perhaps.
Hedonism to me seems more about individuation than any traditional
gnostic goal, although individuation could be said to be a type of
'gnosis' in a modern sense.
Some people are naturally 'balanced' in
terms of light and dark, the self and the self-less. They don't think
about it, make it into a religion or philosophy, they just live it and
are it. Gnostic Luciferianism can become dogmatic amongst 'adherents'
who seek knowledge and wisdom in all they do - and maybe that's the
problem. In many instances, it seems that Luciferians, including Gnostic
Luciferians, regard Luciferianism as such an all applicable philosophy
that it almost becomes a religion in the way it is applied and the
personal approaches to analysis and terminology standardised which is
not really what it is not really in the spirit of the philosophy, in my
opinion. The quest for knowledge can consume a person to the point where
he or she may lose sight of his life's balance, and the whole purpose
of acquiring that knowledge.
'some Luciferians are also strongly influenced by LaVeyan Satanism or by the Temple of Set paradigm, though most are not. Luciferians typically make a sharp distinction between "Lucifer" and "Satan" and between "Luciferianism" and "Satanism," although their idea of "Lucifer" typically does borrow at least some themes from the Christian Devil concept. But a few Gnostic Luciferians do identify as "Satanist" as well as "Luciferian"; a well-known example was Herbert Sloane's Lady of Endor Coven, founded back in 1948. Those relatively few Gnostic Luciferians who do see "Lucifer" and "Satan" as the same entity (or as aspects of the same entity) can be considered Primary Theistic Satanists.'
Comments
Displaying 0 of 0 comments ( View all | Add Comment )