My account was suspended for criticising a Six Seven meme

My account was suspended for criticising a Six Seven meme.

How dysfunctional has our society become when a moderator considers it offensive to criticise an internet meme simply because a 15-year-old admits that reading long paragraphs makes them feel offended?

We're talking about SIX SEVEN. An internet meme. I expressed an opinion about brainrot content, and somehow that was considered more problematic than repeatedly targeting another user with personal posts and accusations.

Apparently, we're now at a point where criticising a meme is treated as an offence, a teenager's inability or unwillingness to engage with written discussion must be accommodated by everyone, and an adult user's contributions can be discarded to protect someone's feelings.

If ordinary criticism is enough to get an account suspended, perhaps the problem isn't the person expressing the criticism, but the moderation standards being applied.

When did disagreement become a punishable offence, and when did protecting someone from opinions they dislike become more important than protecting users from actual harassment?

This teenage girl dedicated SIX CONSECUTIVE BLOG POSTS to me, one after another, yet apparently I'm not even allowed to make a single shitpost in response.

Let that sink in. She can repeatedly target my account, publish post after post about me, make personal accusations and turn a minor disagreement into an entire series of blogs, but the moment I respond with memes, suddenly I'm the problem.

So what's the actual moderation policy here? Are users allowed to harass others as long as they're teenagers, while adults are expected to sit quietly and take it?

I wasn't asking for special treatment. I was asking for the same standards to apply to everyone.

You cannot claim to protect users from harassment while ignoring repeated targeted posts and punishing the person who eventually responds. That's not consistent moderation. That's a double standard.

the peak of comedy