Comments

« Back to Blog Entry


Report

Wow this whole situation sucks, losing access to your account over this is even worse. Based on your pov it does seem like the reporting system was abused, and imo, it shouldn't have resulted in a ban. I hope you can have better interactions with others. There is a setting to remove posts from minors & another to block their friend requests, but I believe there isn't such a setting for the forums? Not sure about that though. :(


Either way i do think we should be able to interact & disagree with each other without that leading to getting banned as a whole (esp when blocking profiles is a thing).



https://friendrewind.com/blog/67-54425


First blog: 

my response: 


---full text in the original post 


Context: She was constantly posting about me, writing: status: outraged

She started doing this right after my very first comment, and although she claimed it wasn't about me, she continued to make references to the entire conversation we’d had regarding maturity.




All of her blog posts have been dedicated to me, and my account has now been taken down as well. So she's not only harassing me for writing to her about maturity, but she's also openly admitting that she's not doing well herself.

She's turned me into her punching bag because I'm someone she can report, unlike her parents or teachers.


Because during the discussion, she wasn't really talking about the six-seven trend anymore. She was essentially telling me that she was having problems at home. So, apparently, I wasn't allowed to discuss six-seven with her, disagree with her arguments, or even respond normally, because she was already dealing with personal issues before our interaction began. There was simply nothing I could do.

She was projecting her feelings towards the adults in her personal life onto me, even though I hadn't actually said anything that would justify the hostility she directed at me.


Why am I supposed to run a daycare for children? In a place that's supposedly meant to uphold freedom of expression.

The thing is, I can start a discussion in a perfectly serious and respectful manner, but eventually become frustrated when someone keeps provoking me. Instead of continuing the original discussion, she kept making post after post about me personally. So when I finally reacted to her repeated claims that I had no sense of humour, and responded with memes, she got offended by that too.

At that point, it became clear that this wasn't really about the six-seven trend anymore. This user already had personal issues before interacting with me, and I shouldn't be held responsible for them. Her reactions were not necessarily caused by anything I said.


I would strongly suggest that this user seek professional psychological support, because the issues she appears to be bringing into these interactions are not my responsibility. She seems to be bringing personal problems from outside the platform into public discussions, to the point where she cannot tolerate a disagreement without turning it into a personal confrontation.

Just look at what she has written throughout the thread. She repeatedly contradicts herself, changes her position and keeps provoking me instead of engaging with the original topic. And I want to make something clear: being a teenager does not automatically mean being disrespectful. Adolescence is not an excuse for treating other people badly.

She was already accusing me of being derogatory from my very first response, which is where this entire situation began. In Spanish, the word denigrante carries a meaning close to humiliating or degrading someone. However, I did not insult, humiliate or degrade her in that initial message. I simply gave her advice about maturity and education.

After that, she continued targeting me. And when I eventually responded with memes after repeatedly being told that I had no sense of humour, she became offended by those too.

But this raises a legitimate question: why am I expected to tolerate someone repeatedly provoking me after I have initially approached them with a serious and respectful response? Why am I expected to absorb an endless stream of personal remarks without ever reacting?

I should be allowed to defend myself when someone repeatedly targets me. A disagreement should not become a situation where one person can provoke another indefinitely, only to portray themselves as the victim the moment they receive a response.



Her response and posts: 




My response: 



Her response : 


At the same time: 

My comment was deleted !!!



<span class="Y2IQFc" lang="en" xml:lang="en">What was written in that message stemmed from the previous post, because she was already picking on me. SHE HAS EDITED HER MESSAGE; the message that’s there now IS NOT THE ORIGINAL.</span>


There’s an entire thread where she was picking on me—which has since been deleted—and furthermore, when she started this post, she was already directing her blog content toward me. That’s the part that’s been edited out—the part where she admits she can’t read a long, detailed text without getting offended or feeling like she’s projecting. Since she projects herself onto my messages and gets offended, that means I’m perfectly entitled to send a meme that says "the divine projector."

I’ve had enough, too—why am I supposed to just sit here and be harassed by a 15-year-old girl?



What I wrote was this:

You don’t take me seriously? Fine—here are some memes; 


"I cannot read" mask  "so much text"


Is that not actually what he’s saying? That she can’t read because of her brainrot?


She hasn’t stopped accusing me—she even wrote entire blog posts about me, and she just kept at it. And now that I’ve finally had enough of her, she pulls the "oh, an adult can’t lecture me because I can’t handle reading that much" card. On top of that, she mocks me; she isn’t just saying "I feel bad"—she’s actively picking on me, sending messages clearly intended to provoke, and then, the moment she gets a response, she acts like everything is an affront to her.


Keep minors isolated

I’ve been banned for telling a minor that "brainrot" can be harmful and that they should study. The minor has been provoking me—dedicating their entire account to me—and while they’ve been free to mess with me as much as their damn well pleased, they can’t handle an actual argument.


What I find disgusting isn’t this girl—it’s the moderation. Who on earth came up with the idea that this young lady—the one from "six seven"—needs to be coddled and kept inside a bubble?


She can go after me and lie—and it’s obvious that she *has* been lying and manipulating the conversation about her age. (For the record, I couldn’t even see her age on her profile.) She keeps saying, "I’m a minor, I’m a minor, I’m a minor—don’t write to me, maturity is for old people!" She even acts surprised that I’d respond with an argument, despite the fact that she’s dedicated her entire account to insulting and denigrating me—an adult who was simply trying to offer some advice. But the moment she provokes someone and gets a meme back that she doesn’t like, suddenly the adult is the "bad guy."

It’s like being in a supermarket where kids throw tantrums like toddlers, knocking products off the shelves—and their parents don’t take responsibility, yet the kids are somehow "untouchable." Well, they should just get lost. The thing I can’t stand is an ill-mannered, insolent teenager who can’t even read properly—someone arrogant, with the comprehension level of a typical TikToker. Her arguments boil down to, "But you watch TikTok! You watch TikTok!" First, she claimed I was judging her solely based on TikTok; then, she turned around and said my memes were typical "TikToker" trash and that I was stupid. I mean, seriously? Am I supposed to feel responsible for "making her feel bad," as she claims? She boasts about knowing three languages, playing four instruments, and being the top of her class—yet it’s clear that "brainrot" has completely rotted her brain, her emotional and logical intelligence, her common sense, and both her affective and cognitive empathy. That was exactly my point in the original message: the problem with "brainrot" isn’t just that you consume it—it’s that it actually impairs your ability to read.


Do you know why I post those memes about the "divine projectionist"? It’s not because I want to pick on her; it’s because she needs to understand that if she provokes adults, she will trigger reactions—her behavior will have consequences. She shouldn’t grow up acting disrespectfully, only for every adult who tries to correct her or put a stop to her behavior to end up being the one who gets penalized. The fact is, she has been insulting and provoking others, and in return, she has received a reaction that mirrors her own actions.

Giving in to an ill-mannered child only serves to perpetuate such behavior; in effect, this kind of moderation rewards it. A child might be developmentally delayed—perhaps even unable to read—yet you end up punishing an adult for trying to teach him. It’s like a child who cries when faced with homework; that’s simply his attitude—whenever he encounters something that overwhelms him, he cries, and cries, and cries, expecting the world to intervene on his behalf.


Validating an ill-mannered child only serves to perpetuate such behavior; in effect, this type of moderation rewards it. A child might be developmentally delayed—perhaps unable to read—yet the system ends up punishing an adult for trying to teach them. It’s like a child who cries when faced with homework; it’s a recurring attitude—whenever they encounter something that challenges them, they cry and cry, expecting the world to intervene on their behalf.


When they enter adulthood, real life will hit them hard. If they haven’t learned to read a contract, that will be their own problem. There is no shortage of scammers out there; if someone only craves flattery, it’s only a matter of time before a predator—someone who specifically targets sensitive, vulnerable individuals lacking in discernment—comes along to sweet-talk them. Predators don’t just strike; they actively seek out people like this—those who lack any real sense of judgment and just want to be coddled with phrases like "poor little thing." 


If they don’t learn these lessons at home, they will have to learn them the hard way out in the real world. We cannot punish the person who offers corrections or warnings; if we do, then no one will be there when a truly dangerous individual—someone with genuine malicious intent—comes along. There will be no one left to speak up and say, "Don't trust strangers," for fear of causing offense. Not everything that is offensive or uncomfortable is intended to cause harm; sometimes, things just need to be stated clearly.


When a child remains entirely trapped within their own little world, it can lead to situations like those that have occurred on platforms like Roblox. This is why adults have a responsibility to look after children—a duty that includes education. It’s not just about protection; it’s also about telling a child when they are behaving inappropriately. If he receives a negative response, it might make him cry—but it’s better that he cries for a day than gets used to the idea that insults come without consequences. The current moderation policy effectively allows insults and rudeness to go unpunished, while anyone who breaks this "poor little thing" dynamic ends up getting banned from the forum. And if 30-year-olds who act like 14-year-olds join in—will the moderators step in then? Don’t make me laugh.





by --temporal 2; ; Report