Replying to
@♠︎Renegade♠︎
(post is on
page 2):
“I like the fact that this site isn't being Moderated by AI hope that it never is, but for people to get on here saying the pictures and stuff like that are A...”
@♠︎John K Callender♠︎
I get much of what you're saying. You're comfortable with various levels of mediation existing between you and your final products. However, some demand creators employ zero levels of mediation, or at least use those tools that don't employ AI, and I believe that's where the debate over AI usage begins.
For the record, I am a writer by trade, and I strive to keep my use of AI as close to zero as I can. However, even grammar checkers employ AI now, so I can't entirely avoid AI usage. Similarly, I am a blogger in my personal life, and not only do I need reliable grammar checking, but I also need at least one free image from sites like Pixabay.com or Pexels.com for each article. Many of the images on those sites were created through the use of AI, and though I often succeed in locating a non-AI image, there are times when the best image found—the one that closest relates to my work—is of AI origin.
I am obviously not an image creation expert. No, I am an employer of the written word and an advocate for human-generated writing. I pore over the text I create knowing that an AI could achieve the same task with far greater speed, but using one would yield a product that is bereft of the emotion, pacing changes, punctuation variations, specific word choices, and other aspects that are the hallmarks of human-generated text. In short, my creations—though well done—will only be as perfect that I, as an imperfect being, can make them. Conversely, an AI will create textbook-perfect text, but the cost in having that is the human element. AI is a tool, and we need tools, but we don't need tools that replace us.
The data centers that power AI are to us what light bulbs were to lamplighters, pinsetters were to pinboys, and Netflix was to video rental stores. They have the power to destroy not just lives, but our entire way of life due to the scope and prevalence of AI. Lamplighters, pinsetters, and video store clerks were left unemployed by very specific advances in technology. Conversely, the adoption of AI is widespread, and it presents the realistic prospect of the elimination of most or all white collar positions within our lifetime. That is not crybabying. No, that is concern. That is an expression of the need to preserve humanity as a species in the face of cold, indefatigable, and absolutely soulless artificial minds of supreme efficiency, all of which can perform days or weeks of office work in minutes, or restore an image autonomously in less than a second.